The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has never issued an announcement requesting that the Chinese citizens return to China.

[Caixin.com] According to the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on May 3, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Yan Shuang hosted a regular press conference. The following is a question and answer record:

Q: It is reported that on May 1st, two US B-1B strategic bombers took off from the US military base in Guam and flew over the sea in the east of South Korea at noon that day, and conducted joint exercises with the Korean Air Force. The DPRK said that the US bomber conducted an exercise to throw a nuclear bomb at the main target. This reckless provocation will push the Korean peninsula further to the brink of war. What is China's comment?

A: We have noticed that the military exercises of relevant parties are still going on. The current situation on the peninsula is highly sensitive and complicated. China opposes any party's words and deeds that intensify tensions and endanger regional peace and stability. It is imperative to push the situation to cool down as soon as possible and restart dialogue and consultation. We once again urge all parties concerned to maintain calm and restraint, stop mutual stimulation, and strive to create an atmosphere for contacts and dialogues between the parties, and strive to return to the correct track of dialogue and negotiations as soon as possible.

Q: It is reported that US Secretary of State Tillerson will hold an informal meeting with the ASEAN Foreign Minister in Washington on the 4th. It is expected that the meeting will discuss the South China Sea issue, especially China's sovereignty. What is China's comment?

A: The South China Sea issue is a problem between China and some ASEAN countries. It is not a problem between China and ASEAN. It is not a problem between China and the United States. It is not a problem between the United States and ASEAN.

In recent times, with the joint efforts of China and ASEAN countries, the situation in the South China Sea has continued to stabilize. This situation is hard-won and deserves to be cherished and maintained by all parties. We also hope that the countries outside the region will respect the efforts of regional countries to jointly safeguard peace and stability in the South China Sea.

Q: According to UN officials, the United States is negotiating with China on more tough measures against North Korea, such as new sanctions. Can you provide more details?

A: At the ministerial-level public meeting on the Korean Peninsula nuclear issue held last week by the UN Security Council, the participants discussed the situation on the current peninsula in full and in-depth discussions. Most members hope that on the one hand, nuclear non-proliferation should be strengthened. We must strengthen persuasion and promote talk.

We believe that it is the only realistic and feasible choice to resolve the nuclear issue on the peninsula through dialogue and consultation and peacefully, and the only correct choice. It is imperative that the parties concerned recover their contacts and dialogue as soon as possible.

Regarding the so-called new sanctions that you mentioned, I have said before that if North Korea conducts further tests or nuclear tests, whether the Security Council will implement new sanctions is a hypothetical issue. I will not make specific comments.

However, it is clear that the relevant paragraph of UN Security Council Resolution 2321 states that the Security Council is determined to take further measures when North Korea conducts nuclear tests or launches again. I can't remember the specific wording, you can check it out.

Q: It is said that the Chinese Embassy in North Korea proposed to leave North Korea for Chinese citizens two weeks ago. Can you confirm?

A: As far as I know, this is a fake news. The Chinese Embassy in the DPRK has never issued a notice calling for Chinese citizens to return to China. China and the DPRK are close neighbors and the two sides maintain normal exchanges. It is normal for Chinese citizens to enter and leave the DPRK every day.

Q: It is reported that the Astana International Conference on Syrian Issues was held from May 3rd to 4th. At present, the contradictions surrounding the Syrian issue are prominent. What expectations does China have for this dialogue?

A: The Astana Dialogue aims to provide a guarantee for the ceasefire in Syria and is a useful supplement to the Geneva peace talks. China always believes that a political solution is the only correct way to resolve the Syrian crisis. We hope that all parties in the international community will make full use of this dialogue to strengthen communication, show sincerity, build mutual trust, accumulate momentum for the next step in the Geneva peace talks mechanism, and contribute to the advancement of the political settlement process in Syria.

Q: You just mentioned Security Council Resolution 2321. Do you mean that under the existing resolutions of the Security Council, there is the possibility of further sanctions against the DPRK?

A: I don't want to mislead you. I suggest you check the exact statement of the relevant provisions of Security Council Resolution 2321.

Q: Some experts have recently worried that North Korea’s further nuclear tests may lead to volcanic eruptions in Changbai Mountain on the border between China and North Korea. What's your opinion? Are you also worried?

A: Further nuclear tests may lead to volcanic eruptions. This is quite scary, but I don't know if there is any scientific basis. If you are interested, you can ask the relevant professional department, I can not give you a professional answer.

What I can say to you is that China adheres to the denuclearization of the peninsula, insists on maintaining peace and stability on the peninsula, and insists on the dialogue and consultation to resolve relevant issues. At the same time, we have repeatedly stressed that the Security Council resolution has a clear prohibition on North Korea’s nuclear activities.

Q: On the 1st, the joint meeting of the Kimberley Process Working Group was held in Perth, Australia. According to Australian media reports, due to Taiwan’s invitation to attend, there was tension at the scene. The Australian Foreign Ministry has allegedly communicated with the Chinese Ambassador to Australia. What is China's position on this? How do the two sides communicate?

A: On the issue of participating in international organizations in Taiwan, our position is clear and consistent, that is, it must be handled in accordance with the one-China principle. When the Kimberley Process was launched in 2003, the Chinese side reached an understanding with the process. China Taiwan temporarily implemented the process certificate system in the name of “Chinese Taipei Diamond Trade Entity”. However, Taiwan is not a full member of the Kimberley Process, it is not an observer, and it is not allowed to participate in the subordinate working group of the process. Or committee meeting.

Before the joint meeting of the Kimberley Process Working Group, the organizers of the meeting unilaterally decided to invite the Taiwanese side to participate in the name of the “guest” of the chairman, in violation of the relevant rules of the process. The Chinese side repeatedly made representations to the organizers beforehand, but China’s legitimate concerns were not respected. Most members of the process, as well as subordinate committees and working groups, also clearly expressed their disapproval of the views of the organizers. But it is puzzling and regrettable that the organizers have not touched and insisted on seeing.

The Chinese side expressed concern over the above-mentioned issues and related arrangements at the process meeting, which is in line with the rules of procedure of the process and is reasonable and reasonable. The position and concerns of the Chinese side have also received the support and support of many members.

Q: Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said today that as the president of the Liberal Democratic Party, he will strive to amend the constitution and implement it in 2020, including the clear positioning of the Self-Defense Force. What is China's comment?

A: Due to historical reasons, Japan’s revision of the constitution of peace has been highly concerned by Asian neighbors. We hope that Japan will learn from the lessons of history, conform to the trend of the times, adhere to the path of peaceful development, and play a constructive role in maintaining regional peace and stability.

Q: According to Greenpeace, Guinea, Sierra Leone and Guinea-Bissau have recently detained eight Chinese fishing boats suspected of illegal fishing. Do you know the situation?

A: We have noticed the situation. The Chinese government has consistently opposed any form of illegal fishing and has always required Chinese-funded fisheries enterprises to adhere to legal and compliance operations and protect the marine ecological environment. At the same time, China hopes that the countries concerned can civilize law enforcement, handle it according to law, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and personnel.

Q: The US ambassador to China, Branstad, said at the Senate hearing that "strict sanctions" may be imposed on Chinese companies in order to strictly enforce sanctions against the DPRK. What is China's comment?

A: First, as a permanent member of the Security Council, China has always comprehensively, accurately, strictly and conscientiously implemented the resolutions of the DPRK adopted by the Security Council and fulfilled our international obligations.

Second, China has consistently opposed any country's unilateral sanctions against other countries in accordance with its own domestic laws, and opposed the actions that harm China's interests.